AHIMSÄ đą SATYA đą ĆAUCA
In my yoga training that just ended the participants put forth some yoga philosophical topics they had been reflecting on and some questions about the state of awareness in the asana practice.
The first question was asked by Jenni. During the training she had concluded that I give the energy level the priority over the physical body when I adjust asanas. She wanted to be sure that she had understood me right. I first answered by admitting that thatâs how I behave. But then I corrected my words by saying that everything always depends on the context.Â
Usually when yoga practitioners practice asanas as if they were doing some sports, which means that they put a lot of effort both in the movement and the immobility of the asana, they canât feel the energy level of their bodies. The power of the physical body overrules it. Whereas if you approach the practice through the energy level, you have a bigger field and a different awareness and you can do a much more subtle practice. You can listen to your different bodies. Therefore, if from this starting point you realize your body needs more energy, power or movement, you can add more energy to it. But it doesnât work the other way around.Â
As a yoga teacher and facilitator I have the same approach. I connect to the student in a bigger field to feel the whole. I listen to this to understand if our âintentionsâ can connect too. If we are one on the energy level, itâs easy to bring the awareness to another element, i.e. to the reality of the physical body. When you are aware of these different fields, you can really support the studentâs practice. For example, if the student has a very errant mind and her/his body feels unrooted, itâs essential to give rootedness with your own physical presence and clear touch. But if the student is very physical, it can be justified to have a lighter and more energetic presence to tune her/him to feel more than just the physicality and in a more sensitive and open way.
To teach yoga and to guide the students are both this kind of listening to me: Do we share the same awareness? Where are we? Are we on the physical, energetical, emotional, mental or spiritual level or on all of these? I can feel if the student is missing the awareness of one of these âbodiesâ. My response to the studentâs unaware parts come from the level the lack of awareness is manifesting. I could give an imaginary example. If the student is emotionally restless, the antidote to this from the teacher’s part is to be at the same time peacefully in her/his own body and in this emotional field to recognize the emotions.Â
Another student in this training, Emma, had been contemplating the principle of purity and cleanliness, Ćauca. She shared her insights of how Ćauca often comes close to the principle of non-violence, ahimsÄ. We talked about this for a while how ahimsÄ is also purity of thought and action. So, indeed, Ćauca and ahimsÄ are very close to each other.Â
And then one student, Viivi, told us how she had had challenges to keep herself to ahimsÄ with a neighbor who had been treated her badly. This was the moment I could bring all these topics together. All these principles of yama and niyama are expressed as energies in and around the body. Therefore ahimsÄ is also about energy. Itâs a certain kind of prÄna. That means itâs not a fixed concept, but very vivid attitude, very vivid energy which adapts to the lifeâs situations. You shouldnâtâ think that someone who is committed to ahimsÄ, never gets angry or never says anything against to anybody. On the contrary! Namely ahimsÄ means that you protect your boundaries, you donât make yourself suffer! Sometimes we meet people who donât respect what we say when we say it in a friendly way. We need to put more energy to make this person understand where the boundaries lie.
I believe that one misunderstanding in interpreting the yoga philosophyâs prescriptions on how to behave, is that you canât use your power. Iâve seen a lot of how some yoga practitioners try to control their real feelings and energies in the fear of not following the yoga principles. Aggression as energy can be used in a constructive way. Because pure aggression is pure. It doesnât harm anybody. It purifies the air and the situation. Thereâs no hatred, attack or destruction. And thatâs why no hatred is left after the situation either.Â
If you try to hide your real feelings, if you try to be nice and understanding in front of some injustice, thatâs when youâre not respecting the yogic principles, such as ahimsÄ, satya and Ćauca. Yoga doesnât mean you deny yourself and you try to be something youâre not. Yoga means Life with a capital letter. We practice yoga on the energy level to be able to response to life with the most adequate energy. All energies are good when they are pure.

VAIKUTTAVA TRIO – AHIMSÄ đą SATYA đą ĆAUCA
Hetki sitten pÀÀttyneen joogakoulutuksen viimeisellĂ€ kerralla osallistujat ottivat poreilevasti esille sekĂ€ erilaisiin tietoisuudentiloihin liittyviĂ€ asanakysymyksiĂ€ ettĂ€ joogafilosofisia aiheita, joita olivat itsekseen pohtineet.Â
Jenni oli tullut siihen johtopÀÀtökseen, ettÀ minÀ avustan asanaharjoituksessa lÀhinnÀ energiatasolla. HÀn halusi varmistua, onko niin, ettÀ energiataso on prioriteettini. KyllÀhÀn se oikeastaan nÀin on, mutta asiaa hetken pohdittuani vastasin, ettÀ kaikki riippuu aina tilanteesta.
YleensÀ on niin, ettÀ jos ihminen tekee asanaharjoitusta urheillen eli fyysisesti ponnistellen sekÀ liikkeiden ettÀ asanan liikkumattomuuden aikana, hÀneltÀ jÀÀ kokematta kehon energiataso. Se peittyy voimankÀytön alle. Kun taas, jos harjoitusta ja itseÀÀn lÀhestyy energiatason kautta, on saman tien laajemmassa kentÀssÀ ja tietoisuudessa ja voi harjoitusta tehdÀ selkeÀsti kuuntelevammin. Jos sitten havaitsee, ettÀ keho tarvitsee enemmÀn energiaa, voimaa tai liikettÀ, sitÀ on helppo siihen lisÀtÀ. ToisinpÀin se ei onnistu.
Ohjaajana toimin samoin sÀÀdöin. LĂ€hestyn oppilasta isommassa kentĂ€ssĂ€ ja tunnen ensin kokonaisuuden. Tunnustelen yhdistyvĂ€tkö meidĂ€n âaikeetâ. Jos energiatasolla yhteys on, on vaivatonta siirtyĂ€ toiseen elementtiin eli fyysisen kehon todellisuuteen. Useammassa eri kentĂ€ssĂ€ työskennellessÀÀn voi myös oikeasti tukea oppilaan tekemistĂ€. Jos esimerkiksi oppilas on jotenkin pÀÀ pilvissĂ€ ja juureton, on olennaista tuoda fyysistĂ€ juurevuutta omalla kehollisella lĂ€snĂ€ololla sekĂ€ tuntuvalla kosketuksella. Mutta sitten taas, jos oppilas on hyvin fyysinen, voi erilainen, kevyempi ja energeettinen lĂ€snĂ€olo, virittÀÀ hĂ€ntĂ€ tuntemaan joko muuta kuin pelkĂ€n fyysisen olemuksen tai sitten ylipÀÀtÀÀn herkemmin ja laajemmin.Â
Joogan opettaminen ja ohjaaminen ovatkin minulle juuri tĂ€llaista kuuntelua: missĂ€ tietoisuudentilassa olen oppilaan kanssa? Olemmeko fyysisessĂ€, energeettisessĂ€, emotionaalisessa, mentaalisessa, spirituaalisessa kentĂ€ssĂ€ vai kaikissa nĂ€issĂ€ yhdessĂ€? Tunnen, kun oppilaalta puutuu yhteys johonkin nĂ€istĂ€ “kehoista”. Myös ohjaus oppilaan kehojen tiedostamattomiin kohtiin tulevat juuri sen kehon tietoisuuden tasolta, jossa tiedostamattomuus ilmenee. EsimerkkinĂ€ tĂ€stĂ€ voisi olla tilanne, jossa oppilas on tunnetasolla levoton. Siihen vastalÀÀke on olla ohjaajana rauhassa omassa kehossaan, ja samaan aikaan siinĂ€ energiakentĂ€ssĂ€, jossa emootiot liikkuvat, jotta ne voi tunnistaa.Â
Toinen osallistuja, Emma, oli miettinyt puhtautta eli Ćaucaa ja miten lĂ€helle se lopulta tulee ahimsÄa (elĂ€mĂ€n kunnioittamista). Puhuimme siitĂ€, miten nimenomaan ajatuksen ja teon puhtaus on ahimsÄa. Toki myös fyysisen kehon puhdistaminen ja puhtaus liittyvĂ€t lĂ€heisesti ahimsÄan, koska itsestĂ€mme huolehtiminen on elĂ€mĂ€stĂ€ huolehtimista.
Kolmas osallistuja, Viivi, taas kertoi haasteesta pysyĂ€ ahimsÄssa tietyissĂ€ tilanteissa. HĂ€n oli halunnut noudattaa ahimsÄa suhteessa naapuriinsa, joka oli jo pitkÀÀn kĂ€yttĂ€ytynyt törkeĂ€sti. Otin tĂ€stĂ€ kiinni ja jatkoin ajatusta energiatason asiana, miten yama- ja niyama-periaatteet ovat erilaisia energian ilmentymiĂ€. NimittĂ€in ahimsÄkaan ei ole mikÀÀn kiinteĂ€ kĂ€site, vaan aina elĂ€vĂ€ tietoisuus, asenne ja elĂ€vĂ€ energia ja siten elĂ€viin tilanteisiin mukautuva. Siksi ei pidĂ€ ajatella, ettĂ€ ahimsÄa noudattava ihminen ei koskaan suuttuisi tai sanoisi kenellekÀÀn vastaan. PĂ€invastoin! NimittĂ€in ahimsÄ-periaate sulkee sisÀÀnsĂ€ tietenkin myös jokaisen itsensĂ€ ja niinpĂ€ meidĂ€n pitÀÀ pitÀÀ puoliamme ja kunnioittaa rajojamme. Joskus vastassa voi olla ihminen, jolle ei riitĂ€ se, ettĂ€ sanoo ystĂ€vĂ€llisesti. Laitamme ponnekkuutta mukaan sen verran, mitĂ€ tarvitaan, jotta tilanne tulee tasapainoon.Â
Uskon, ettĂ€ yksi vÀÀrinkĂ€sitys joogafilosofian kĂ€yttĂ€ytymiseen liittyvien kĂ€sitteiden tulkinnassa onkin se, ettei ihminen voisi hyödyntÀÀ aggressiota eli omaa voimaansa. Olennaista on se, ettĂ€ aggressio kĂ€ytetÀÀn rakentavassa tarkoituksessa. Olen kyllĂ€ nĂ€hnyt sitĂ€, miten joogaajat yrittĂ€vĂ€t pidĂ€ttÀÀ todellisia tunteitaan ja energioitaan siinĂ€ pelossa, ettĂ€ he eivĂ€t sitten enÀÀ elĂ€isikÀÀn nĂ€iden periaatteiden mukaan. Kuitenkin puhdas aggressio on puhdasta. Se ei vahingoita ketÀÀn. Se puhdistaa ilman ja tilanteen. Se syntyy vastaukseksi johonkin energiaan. SiinĂ€ ei ole vihaa. NĂ€in se ei myöskÀÀn jĂ€tĂ€ jĂ€lkeensĂ€ mitÀÀn pahaa.Â
Jos yritĂ€t peittÀÀ todelliset tunteesi, jos yritĂ€t olla kiva ja ymmĂ€rtĂ€vĂ€ loputtomiin jonkun epĂ€oikeudenmukaisuuden suhteen, silloin vasta rikotkin erilaisia joogan periaatteita, kuten ahimsÄa, satyaa ja Ćaucaa. Joogassa ei ole kyse siitĂ€, ettĂ€ kieltÀÀ itsensĂ€ ja yrittÀÀ olla muuta kuin on. Jooga on ElĂ€mÀÀ isolla e:llĂ€, eikĂ€ elĂ€mĂ€n kieltĂ€mistĂ€ meissĂ€ tai muissa. Harjoittelemme asanoitakin energiatasolla voidaksemme vastata elĂ€mÀÀn oikealla energialla. MikĂ€ tahansa energia on hyvÀÀ, kun se on puhdasta.